Log in

I forgot my password

Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» we made the news
Wed Apr 22, 2015 5:45 pm by centralPA

» going over old times
Wed Apr 22, 2015 1:17 pm by Dirtbikepilot

» Hi I'm Blythe and new to this site
Wed Apr 22, 2015 12:20 pm by Dirtbikepilot

» Hi-Jacked Thread
Wed Apr 22, 2015 12:00 pm by Dirtbikepilot

» Never say die.
Wed Apr 22, 2015 11:54 am by Dirtbikepilot

» Peace and quiet.
Wed Apr 22, 2015 11:44 am by Dirtbikepilot

» Christmas cheer
Wed Dec 25, 2013 2:15 am by alexisio

» we lost the mayor race
Mon Dec 02, 2013 11:31 am by Dirtbikepilot

» Dear Diary
Sun Oct 20, 2013 6:45 am by alexisio

November 2017
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Calendar Calendar

Affiliates
free forum


lawful versus legal video

Page 2 of 2 Previous  1, 2

View previous topic View next topic Go down

lawful versus legal video

Post by Apocalypse prettysoon on Tue Jun 05, 2012 9:13 am

First topic message reminder :

Looks like Max Igan was a fan of the other forum. Where I had my lawful versus legal thread. Because thats what he's called his youtube. Here's the link to part 1, starts talking about lawful versus legal policy at around 9 minutes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ph2jDGERStk#!

These internet personailties might be more a palatable way to introduce yourself to the true nature of this world than me. That we are enslaved, have our values and knowledge controlled, and are being milked like cows.

Once you realise that you'll be ready to go a little deeper and find the who and the why. Thats where I come in. (Jesuits ending the protestant revolution)
avatar
Apocalypse prettysoon

Posts : 378
Join date : 2012-05-03
Location : NSW

View user profile

Back to top Go down


Re: lawful versus legal video

Post by alexisio on Fri Jun 08, 2012 11:36 pm

OUCH!
avatar
alexisio

Posts : 761
Join date : 2012-05-02
Age : 26
Location : fraser coast qld

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: lawful versus legal video

Post by Apocalypse prettysoon on Fri Jun 08, 2012 11:54 pm

I would luke but i dont speak smiley
and i didnt get his point anyway.
must be queensland logic
avatar
Apocalypse prettysoon

Posts : 378
Join date : 2012-05-03
Location : NSW

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: lawful versus legal video

Post by lucky luke on Sat Jun 09, 2012 12:02 am

Apocalypse prettysoon wrote:I would luke but i dont speak smiley
and i didnt get his point anyway.
must be queensland logic

Hey!!! Take it easy with the Queensland logic bit!!!
avatar
lucky luke

Posts : 92
Join date : 2012-06-06
Location : Cootamundra

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: lawful versus legal video

Post by alexisio on Sat Jun 09, 2012 12:52 am

He cant help himself , he is a poor refugee pig
avatar
alexisio

Posts : 761
Join date : 2012-05-02
Age : 26
Location : fraser coast qld

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: lawful versus legal video

Post by Blythe Masters on Wed Jun 13, 2012 9:34 am

alexisio wrote:T thought a Barrister made coffee! Embarassed

Oh how cute. No dear that would be spelt Barista.

Blythe I love you
avatar
Blythe Masters

Posts : 36
Join date : 2012-05-03
Age : 48
Location : USA

View user profile http://www.jpmorganchase.com/corporate/Home/home.htm

Back to top Go down

Re: lawful versus legal video

Post by alexisio on Wed Jun 13, 2012 10:32 am

Blythe Masters wrote:
alexisio wrote:T thought a Barrister made coffee! Embarassed

Oh how cute. No dear that would be spelt Barista. Hell maybe you should cum an give me some private lessons.

Blythe I love you
avatar
alexisio

Posts : 761
Join date : 2012-05-02
Age : 26
Location : fraser coast qld

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: lawful versus legal video

Post by alexisio on Wed Jun 13, 2012 10:33 am

Blythe, cum teach me to be a refined gentleman.
avatar
alexisio

Posts : 761
Join date : 2012-05-02
Age : 26
Location : fraser coast qld

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: lawful versus legal video

Post by Bulldog on Wed Jun 13, 2012 12:43 pm

alexisio wrote:Blythe, cum teach me to be a refined gentleman.

Wonders in five minutes ! miracles take little longer. Hence the expression....flogging a dead horse.
avatar
Bulldog

Posts : 611
Join date : 2012-05-02
Age : 68
Location : Perth

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: lawful versus legal video

Post by Apocalypse prettysoon on Thu Jun 14, 2012 1:45 am

I'm trying to see how to get a writ of quo warranto. Which is how you claim a right promised by the queen. In my case its the right to use the common roads without being randomly accused of a crime and forced at the threat of violence to prove myself innocent.
And I happened to stumble across this ocnversation involving Frank O'Collins and the way the financial world really works.

Frank O'Collins is a Jesuit trained Australian and well regarded by freemen. (although I'm highly suspicious of anyone Jesuit trained.)

Anyhow while this is a conversation and devoid of proof, its very interesting.


[2/8/2012 12:09:49 PM] jenn: [Tuesday, February 07, 2012 11:36 PM] jenn:

<<< [05/02/2012 2:09:12 PM] Frank O'Collins: ================================================
White- Original

================================================
Yellow - color of receipt, remittance, acknowledgment, duplicate copy (equitable title)
================================================

Blue - color of document to Dealer/Agent/Sheriff/Bailiff/Police
================================================

Pink - color of customer copy/respondent/defendant/named party
=================================================
[05/02/2012
2:09:27 PM] Trine aka Gerald: Corporations cannot engage in Treaties
either in International Law. Corporations do not own any land they only
have Right of Use of Land.
[05/02/2012 2:10:06 PM] Trine aka Gerald: Remittance is Money.
[05/02/2012 2:11:32 PM] Frank O'Collins: 1. Petitioner, petitions the Executor (General Executor) of Estate to enforce a right
[05/02/2012
2:11:58 PM] Frank O'Collins: 2. Executor calls Court, review and issues
Summary of Petition granting or denying petition of writ
[05/02/2012
2:12:54 PM] Frank O'Collins: 3. If accepted, a original (in white) is
created and recorded into a Register of Writs of the Estate by the
Supreme Court of Estate, Chancery Office (or Division).
[05/02/2012
2:13:11 PM] Frank O'Collins: The white copy then becomes the original
property "underwriting" the title (record in register).
[05/02/2012
2:13:45 PM] Frank O'Collins: 4. 3 coloured copies of registered writ are
issued, with Great Seal, signed in Yello, Blue and Pink.
[05/02/2012
2:14:13 PM] Frank O'Collins: 5. The Yellow copy which is remittance is
handed to petitioner to hold as proof of valid writ being issued by
Estate;
[05/02/2012 2:14:54 PM] Frank O'Collins: 6. The Blue Copy is
handed to sheriff/bailiff/police/marshal to enforce the orders of the
writ in accordance with their oath to the people/office etc.
[05/02/2012 2:15:06 PM] Frank O'Collins: 7. Pink copy is handed to the respondent
[05/02/2012 2:15:42 PM] Frank O'Collins: Writ generally was half the size of a standard page.
[05/02/2012 2:16:07 PM] Frank O'Collins: Summary of Petition - Indictment
[05/02/2012
2:16:39 PM] Frank O'Collins: This must be handed to respondant also to
all parties (eg bailiff) as it explains the reason for issue of writ
[05/02/2012 2:17:52 PM] jenn: yes
[05/02/2012 2:19:44 PM] Lynn: yes
[05/02/2012 2:20:08 PM] Lynn: absolutely
[05/02/2012 2:20:11 PM] jenn: yes i do think it will be useful
[05/02/2012 2:20:29 PM] jenn: pink
[05/02/2012 2:20:45 PM] jenn: ok
[05/02/2012 2:21:25 PM] jenn: liability
[05/02/2012 2:23:07 PM] jenn: ok. that makes sense
[05/02/2012 2:29:10 PM] Lynn: yes
[05/02/2012 2:29:12 PM] jenn: yes
[05/02/2012 2:31:47 PM] jenn: yes
[05/02/2012 2:32:21 PM] Lynn: canon law 1983 or 1993...clarify
[05/02/2012 2:32:26 PM] Lynn: thanks
[05/02/2012 2:33:45 PM] jenn: yes pls
[05/02/2012 2:33:53 PM] Frank O'Collins: =========================================
[05/02/2012 2:34:10 PM] Frank O'Collins: CQV + Estate
[05/02/2012 2:34:18 PM] Frank O'Collins: 1st of four Capital Bonds
[05/02/2012
2:35:12 PM] Frank O'Collins: 1st Capital Bond is Birth Bond, aggregated
into a Fund (usually the Day) and then traded as a Security in Chicago
where it is purchased by the IMF on behalf of the BIS on behalf of the
SKOM on behalf of the Vatican
[05/02/2012 2:35:30 PM] Frank O'Collins: Price paid is usually in US $2 to 3 billion per baby
[05/02/2012 2:35:42 PM] Frank O'Collins: ==========================================
[05/02/2012 2:35:53 PM] Frank O'Collins: Charging of accounts is according to certain rules
[05/02/2012
2:37:15 PM] Frank O'Collins: Managed by the Private Reserve Bank
oversighted by the Queens Bench wherever it is in each country
[05/02/2012 2:37:31 PM] Frank O'Collins: ===========================================
[05/02/2012
2:37:59 PM] Frank O'Collins: Legitimate charges against the account
include health, education, taxes, financial loans, infrastructure,
defense, etc etc.
[05/02/2012 2:38:31 PM] Frank O'Collins: Therefore
any revenue raised by taxes is gathered directly by a debt collection
agency of the IMF and represents the dividends of the performance bonds
[05/02/2012 2:38:34 PM] Frank O'Collins: ============================================
[05/02/2012 2:38:57 PM] Frank O'Collins: Not one $ raised in taxes from the people goes to the Government
[05/02/2012 2:39:01 PM] Frank O'Collins: =============================================
[05/02/2012 2:39:08 PM] Frank O'Collins: 3 other Capital Bonds
[05/02/2012 2:39:19 PM] Frank O'Collins: 2nd is Social Security (Work)
[05/02/2012 2:39:23 PM] Frank O'Collins: 3rd Health
[05/02/2012 2:39:27 PM] Frank O'Collins: 4th Marriage
[05/02/2012 2:39:34 PM] Frank O'Collins: ==============================================
[05/02/2012
2:40:14 PM] Frank O'Collins: By being part of the bankruptcy system in
place- Govt has swift accounts, registration with US SEC to trade,
participate in the global banking/trading cartel.
[05/02/2012 2:40:19 PM] Frank O'Collins: ==============================================
[05/02/2012
2:41:12 PM] Frank O'Collins: If the elected politicians were to tell
truth and end bankruptcy, then IMF/BIS would declare interdict against
country- which for industrialized country would be equivalent to sending
it for fifteen years + into stone age.
[05/02/2012 2:42:40 PM] Frank O'Collins: This is the answer to the secret of the massive funds in Committee of 300 docs.

.
avatar
Apocalypse prettysoon

Posts : 378
Join date : 2012-05-03
Location : NSW

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: lawful versus legal video

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 2 of 2 Previous  1, 2

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum